Had Had Had
Buy Ambien Generic Online 37 Hads
https://www.club-italia.com/2024/06/buy-ambien-online-next-day-delivery in a discussion of lexical ambiguity, bill, whereas ben had
Buy Zolpidem Paypal “had had ‘had’, had had ‘had had’; ‘had had’ had had”,
Online Ambien Prescription had had
“had had ‘had had’, had had ‘had’; ‘had had’ had had”;
https://www.magiciansgallery.com/2024/06/order-zolpidem-overnight “had had ‘had’, had had ‘had had’; ‘had had’ had had”
had the greater approval of their friends.
https://forumlenteng.org/buy-zolpidem-overnight here is the explanation
https://vita.com.bo/cheap-zolpidem-online 1.
https://vita.com.bo/ambien-online-uk you need to consider the original 11 piece had thing….I’m calling it an example of lexical ambiguity.
in a discussion of lexical ambiguity, “jack, whereas jill had had ‘ https://www.ag23.net/cheap-generic-zolpidem had‘, had had ‘had had‘; ‘had had’Â https://starbrighttraininginstitute.com/zolpidem-india-buy had had“Â the greater approval of the english professor.
Cheap Ambien From Canada this basically highlights the difference between the use of phrase https://arkipel.org/buy-ambien-fast-shipping Had as opposed the the phrase Had Had.
if you understand this in full, then read on…..
https://medcardnow.com/buy-ambien-online-reviews
Buy Ambien Online Uk https://habitaccion.com/buy-zolpidem-from-uk 2.
Zolpidem Online Cheap Now, two people, Bill and Ben are trying to correctly remember this expression. But they each remember it differently.
bill had correctly remembered it thus:
https://www.club-italia.com/2024/06/buy-ambien-online-australia jack, whereas jill had had ‘ https://forumlenteng.org/buy-ambien-online-mexico had‘, had had ‘had had’; ‘ Buying Zolpidem In Mexico had had‘ had had the greater approval of the english professor (we will call this: version 1)
whereas ben, had mistakenly remembered it thus:
https://www.magiciansgallery.com/2024/06/ambien-12-5-cr-buy jack, whereas jill had had ‘ https://medcardnow.com/ambien-buy-uk had had‘, had had ‘ https://creightondev.com/2024/06/24/zolpidem-india-buy had‘; ‘had had’ had had the greater approval of the english professor (we will call this: version 2)
https://creightondev.com/2024/06/24/order-ambien-canada In bill’s memory it was jack who used had had. but in ben’s memory it was jill who had used had had.
if you fully understand the difference between these two versions, then read on…
https://starbrighttraininginstitute.com/ambien-buy-cheap 3.
https://www.club-italia.com/2024/06/buy-ambien-generic we are now going to recall the two versions by quoting the bill version (version 1) , and then quoting the ben version (version 2).
https://forumlenteng.org/ambien-12-5-cr-buy Effectively we will be saying this:
https://habitaccion.com/buying-ambien-in-mexico ben, whereas bill remembered “(version 1)”, had remembered “(version 2)”
https://medcardnow.com/order-ambien-online however
instead of saying “remembered” we say ‘had had’
https://makeitagarden.com/ambien-overnight-delivery-cheap so replacing “remembered” with, ‘had had” we arrive at:
Buy Generic Ambien Cr ben, whereas bill had had “version 1” had had “version 2”
https://vita.com.bo/zolpidem-online-shop if you understand this full, then read on…..
https://www.ag23.net/order-zolpidem-tartrate https://vita.com.bo/zolpidem-tablets-online 4.
Onto the end of this statement of memory we need to add the approval of the friends.
What the friends approve of is bill’s memory of events (version 1) , over ben’s memory of events (version 2)
so we say the friends approved of bill’s memory “version 1” rather than ben’s memory “version 2”
https://arkipel.org/buy-generic-ambien-canada or in other words:
https://www.club-italia.com/2024/06/buying-ambien-in-canada “version 1” had had the greater approval of their friends in terms of memory of the event.
https://www.magiciansgallery.com/2024/06/cheap-generic-zolpidem if you understand this full, then read on…..
https://creightondev.com/2024/06/24/buy-ambien-online-overnight-cod
https://exitoffroad.com/can-you-safely-buy-ambien-online 5.
We will now put all the statements together.
ben remembered version 2
wheras
bill remembered version 1
version 1 was then regarded by the friends as the correct version
or rather
In a discussion concerning different memories of the telling of the “had had” example of lexical ambiguity, ben wheras bill had had “version 1”, had had “version 2”. “version 1” had had the greater approval of their friends.
now
in place of “version 1″ and Version 2” we actually state the hads.
so we arrive at:
In a discussion concerning different memories of the telling of the “had had” example of lexical ambiguity,
ben, whereas bill had “had had ‘had’, had had ‘had had’; ‘had had’ had had“, had had
“had had ‘had had’, had had ‘had’; ‘had had’ had had“;
“had had ‘had’, had had ‘had had’; ‘had had’ had had” had had the greater approval of their friends